Dessert for Pudding and Pudding for Dessert

I must say, I love the name: “Strawberry Dessert”. What does that mean, exactly? It could really be anything! Perhaps a delicate pink soufflé or a magical strawberry-scented fluff?

While British readers won’t find the word “pudding” any less ambiguous than “dessert”, for the Americans out there, the translation is simple: this is just like Jell-O brand pudding. You get some powder, stir in some milk (semi-skimmed or whole are equally tasty, boasts the box) and viola! Ten minutes later you have pudding, which ever definition you follow.

I was a bit meh on this one. The texture was odd, with the top layer gritty and a different consistency than what lie beneath, however, I suspect that stirring might remedy this. The taste was like Nesquick, in other words, very artificial. The product itself wasn’t terrible, and I think I might give the chocolate flavour a go, as it does have one big draw for me: it’s low in calories and saturated fat. For the diet conscious, you could do worse.

Image of Alpine Strawberry taken from van swearingen’s Flickr photstream.

Saving Money at the Cost of the Environment?

Sainsbury’s Basics plastic freezer bags seem like a good way to keep costs down. They are inexpensive (49p), and allow you to bring food from home to lunch, a practice most of us are turning to during this time of economic hardship. There is a better option, however, one that will continue to keep costs down and be friendly to the environment: plastic containers.

Personally, I’m thinking of throwing Tupperware parties. Tupperware should be hot like it’s the 50s, considering how dire most of our finances are. Instead of tossing last night’s leftover Basics Stuffing (review coming soon!), pop it in a container and eat it tomorrow!

Maybe Sain’s should consider throwing Tupperware parties, too. Okay, maybe not parties, but rather than sell cheap, wasteful bags, why not sell some eco-friendly reusable containers? It would make sense, considering the no-more-plastic-bags-at-the-till campaign they’re running. Or perhaps that is just for show, as I am always hearing cashiers ask people if they want a plastic bag. It should no longer be a question of want, but one of need. Do you really need to put that one apple in a plastic produce bag, then in a plastic bag, and then in your wheely cart that you’re pushing home?

This is a Basics product that I’m going to have to give a big thumbs down to, not because of its quality or value for money, but for the simple fact that while we may like low cost plastic bags, the environment doesn’t.

And if you want some Tupperware, party at my place!

Image of The Oxford Road Orange Bag Parade taken from Zach_ManchesterUK’s Flickr photstream.

All Shapes and Sizes Welcome

The bag says “all shapes and sizes”, but really, a pepper is a pepper. This Basics product should be a no-brainer to the cost-conscious pepper lover, as a bag of six peppers for only £1.48 is a steal. And if you’re lucky, you might get a bag with no greens! Sure, some of the peppers are small, others are a bit dirty, and even more are lopsided, but when cut up (and thoroughly washed) who can tell the difference?

I’m sure the Sainsbury’s Basics marketing people were working late last night, after the news that the EU is lifting the ban on selling less-than-perfect produce. Expect to see a cornucopia of new Basics, including carrots, cucumbers, asparagus and garlic. With the addition of 26 new Basics fodder, the marketing team is going to have to put in some overtime to come up with snappy slogans. I’ve decided to help them out with a few ideas of my own:

Carrots: Knobbly but nice

Onions: Nothing to cry about

Beans: Will still make you toot

Garlic: Strange shape, still smelly

Mushrooms: At least we washed the shit off!

There are still 11 fruits and vegetables that are lovingly protected by the EU, so don’t expect to see any unappetising apples, unsightly strawberries, or loathsome lettuce anytime soon. Personally I’m glad—we can’t let the world think we’ve gotten rid of all of our standards, can we?

Does the Job

Recently I was down the pub with my friend Ciq and he asked me whatever had become of this blog. Rather embarrasingly, I was forced to admit that I’d neglected it horribly for no good reason other than my own laziness. It could have been worse, though: I could have switched to buying Tesco Value.

Best to remedy this sad state of affairs with a product review, I say! Let’s start with a less-than-a-pound gem that the feline of the house uses daily: Sainsbury’s Basics Cat Litter.

Before you alert the animal cruelty authorities to this, make no mistake that this is a decent quality cat litter and it’s clearly Chloe’s preference. I once tried to upgrade her to the £4/bag posh stuff and she pissed on my bed in protest. Perhaps she didn’t want to damage her street cred by using a prissy piss powder and have the other cats think she’d gone soft. One mattress flip and a quick run down to the Camden Sainsbury’s later and the little princess was back peeing in her box, though temporarily banned from the bedroom.

What you get here is the sheer essence of cat litter, nothing more. It’s a giant bag of chunky, somewhat absorbent gravel. There’s no odour-cancelling aspect nor any fancy clumping action here. One might say there’s something retro about its simplicity. This is litter that any cat from the 70s would proudly poop in, whilst the modern kitty can delight in a lack of pretense that sets them free to pee without worry of overstepping their station in life.

One crucial caveat does, however, exist. Due to the coarse nature of the litter, your cat will be able to kick up a fair bit of dust as they paw around in it. This isn’t a concern for open top cat boxes, but ours came with a cover and a cat flap door. In that closed environment, Chloe kicked up such a cloud that she sometimes emerged wheezing and coughing. We ditched the cover and now just leave the box open, but if that’s unacceptable to you, you probably want to avoid this and try something slightly more refined.

In summary, I declare this to be a Basics bargain. You get a massive sack of litter for less than a pound and it does exactly what it says on the tin (or, er, paper bag): it “does the job”. Could you do worse? I suppose you could try to shred the London Lite and see if your cat will give that a go, but I’d make sure the bedroom door is shut tight beforehand.

Back to Basics

I’ve been living in the UK for just over a year and a half. My wife and I moved here for my dream job, which reality proved to be more of a nightmare. These past several months have not been lacking in difficult moments. Fortunately, in the darkest hours, I always had an awkwardly comforting sentiment to assist in retaining perspective. It just happened to be something I learned during my first fortnight in the country.

Searching for a place to live in an overcrowded metropolis is one of the more unpleasant aspects of contemporary life. After several days spent touring overpriced shitholes in far outlying neighbourhoods, we finally found a comparative gem in Camden Town. It was small and overpriced, yeah, but it was a clean, brand-new development and centrally-located. A far cry from the palace we had in Chicago, but with us and our cat living in a crappy hotel that was fastly depleting our meagre funds, compromise was going to prove essential in improving our immediate situation.

As we discussed the flat with our future landlord, he modestly listed the virtues of his property, “Washing machine, large wardrobes, hardwood floors, bit of a deck outside: you could do worse!” Wait, huh?

You see, where I come from, everything is oversold and hyped beyond belief. This is why “awesome” has come to be known as the quintessence of American slang. We like superlatives, generally a little too much. When everything is the best thing ever, nothing stands out, and after a while, it all begins to feel slightly mediocre. Nevertheless, when you’re trying to sell something in America, your prime directive is to convince the potential buyer that what you’re selling will truly inspire awe.

So naturally I was a bit confused when our dear landlord’s best sales pitch ended with an enthusiastic and somewhat gleeful exclamation of “You could do worse!” Immediately I thought of that statement’s inverse: I could do better. Well, yes, of course I could do better. Perhaps the next flat I would see would be bigger and have more mod cons for the exact same price or less. I could also do worse, however, as Mr. Landlord so aptly noted. I might not see something this nice again for weeks and then by the time I came back round to beg for this place, it will have already been let to someone else. A gamble was placed before me, and I needed to choose whether to hold ‘em or to fold ‘em.

I folded ‘em after about 15 seconds. The flat was good enough and it meant we could move out of the hotel and actually get things sent to us in the post and put groceries in the fridge and make cups of tea and do all the things that people who live in flats do. The next day we signed the lease and proceeded to the nearest pub to celebrate.

I left my landlord’s office that day with more than just the joyous privilege of paying him gobs of money each month. I also got four words out of the deal. If something’s not going your way, you can generally stop and think, “You could do worse,” and most of the time you’d be absolutely right. Whilst it sucks to be chained to Jabba the Hutt sporting your best bikini, you could be inside the Sarlaac Pit as it slowly spends the next 1,000 years digesting you.

Perhaps “you could do better” is a sentiment born of the American Dream. It’s a thought that means well, for at its best it encourages you to strive for more. At its worst, however, it prevents you from being happy with what you already have. “You could do worse” always reminds you to be thankful for what’s right in front of you. It’s possible that the tension between the two variations of this phrase sits at the centre of the gap between American and English approaches to life. I’d love to explore this juxtaposition more deeply, but unfortunately this is not an anthropology study, it’s just the beginning of a blog about Sainsbury’s Basics products.

For the uninitated, Sainsbury’s Basics is the popular UK supermarket chain’s bargain basement line. I’d call it their generic range, but that word belies the greatness behind the humble white, orange and yellow packaging. Generic products don’t put any extra effort in, whereas Sainsbury’s Basics is frugality with a self-conscious sense of humour. Why am I so obsessed with one specific budget line of groceries and household items? Nothing I’ve found anywhere in Britain expresses the sentiment of “you could do worse” better than Sainsbury’s Basics.

Almost every Sainsbury’s Basics product has a tag line that shrugs its shoulders and thinks, “Well, you could do worse!” The slightly-more-than-£2 bottle of red wine quips, “For the table, not the cellar,” as the simple fruit salad honestly states, “Not fancy, still fruity.” Clearly if you have a tenner to drop on a bottle of vino, Sainsbury’s Basics won’t get in your way, but if you’re impecunious and in need of a tipple, it’s there for you with open arms and a good, straight-forward taste. You could do better, but you could do worse. Having no wine at all is, indeed, far worse!

This could be the story of our epiphany at the end of the supermarket aisle, but will mostly be the tale of Rin and I eating a lot of really cheap food and telling you what to steer clear of and what to stock up on. Sometimes you need to treat yourself and buy posh, but most of the time you can get by on the basics. You could do worse: you could be forced to shop at Somerfield.